Skip to content
SweepstakePlanning notes

Independent UK planning reference

Plan the numbers.
Question the rules.

A sweepstake can mean different things: an office arrangement, a charity fundraiser or a promotional prize draw. Start by separating the context from the arithmetic, rather than assuming a familiar name makes the activity permitted.

Use this independent planning worksheet to compare equal hypothetical contributions and proposed prize allocations. It does not accept entries, handle money, assign teams or select winners. There is no live promotion to join.

Open the anonymous worksheet ↗
Football and player's boots on a grass pitch
Illustrative sport photography, not an event or prize offered here.
Numbers, not names

The worksheet uses entrant count only. Keep participant lists, contact details and payment records out of it.

Local calculations

Figures stay in this page’s memory. Reloading clears changes; a requested TXT download stays on your device.

No launch permission

A balanced allocation is a mathematical result, not evidence that any proposed activity meets legal requirements.

An organiser’s arithmetic notebook

Equal contributions & allocation worksheet

Everything below is hypothetical. Change the sample numbers to explore a draft budget, not to create an entry or reserve a prize. The default example is twelve people contributing £5 each: £60 in total, with no costs deducted.

Hypothetical result only

Percentages must total exactly 100. Each amount is rounded down to whole pennies; any remainder is shown separately, never silently added to an allocation.

Formula: count × equal contribution = total; total − proposed costs = available balance. Allocation A, B and C apply to that balance. These labels are budget lines, not awarded positions. A displayed cost allowance does not mean that deduction is permitted in your context.

For a second fictional example, eight people at £2.50 give £20. With £2 proposed costs, the balance is £18; a 50/30/20 split gives £9, £5.40 and £3.60. Decide any rounding policy before an activity, with suitable review, rather than changing a distribution afterwards.

A numerical check is only one part of a review

Try changing the third allocation from 20 to 19. The worksheet rejects that draft because the percentages leave part of the balance unassigned. Restore 20, then enter a cost greater than the total: that also produces an error. Correct the inputs before downloading; an earlier valid result must not survive as if it described the new figures.

Small balances expose rounding assumptions particularly clearly. Three hypothetical contributions of £0.01 create £0.03. At 50/30/20, rounding each line down gives £0.01, £0.00 and £0.00, leaving £0.02 unallocated. A visible remainder is more useful than a total that appears balanced only because software quietly changed one amount.

For your own notes, distinguish a draft count from a confirmed audience, an assumed cost from an evidenced expense, and an intended allocation from a payment. The download is a snapshot of entered figures, not a receipt, ticket, invitation or statement that funds exist. Keep it labelled hypothetical when sharing it for review.

There is deliberately no random button, team list or participant import. Those would change the task from examining assumptions to administering an activity. This resource stops at planning arithmetic and unresolved questions, leaving any real-world mechanism outside the website.

Classification before promotion

Three contexts are not interchangeable

The Gambling Commission guidance below concerns Great Britain. Northern Ireland has a different framework; do not read a UK-facing title as UK-wide permission. Get qualified advice about the actual location, people, entry method and proposed benefit.

Workplace sweepstake

The Commission describes work lotteries involving colleagues at the same physical workplace. Its guidance requires physical tickets, equal ticket prices and non-transferable rights, with no online, email or telephone ticket sales. The draw takes place at the business premises, not online.

A multi-site team chat is not the same thing as one physical workplace. No rollover is permitted under that guidance. Review the purpose, expenses and use of proceeds too; calling an arrangement informal does not settle its status.

Free draw

A free draw is not simply a paid activity with “free” in the headline. Where both paid and free routes exist, the Commission sets conditions on cost, convenience, prominence and equal treatment in determining prizes. Normal-rate communication has a specific meaning in its guidance.

This site does not supply a free-entry mechanism. An anonymous budget tool cannot assess an entry route, its advertising or its administration.

Prize competition

The Commission describes competitions determined by skill, knowledge or judgement, with a meaningful threshold. Multiple-choice questions and second chances rarely meet its stated criteria. Adding a trivial question does not provide a reliable shortcut.

The Commission does not approve free draws or prize competitions. Neither our worksheet nor a source link gives regulatory endorsement or a certificate of legality.

Tennis player preparing a shot on an outdoor court
Illustrative tennis photography. No tournament association implied.

Keep the planning decisions visible

Questions to resolve before anything launches

A clear written plan should identify the organiser, intended audience, location, entry conditions, dates, proposed allocations and what happens if an event changes. These are questions for review, not ready-made rules suitable for every activity.

  • What is the correct category, and who has checked the applicable framework?
  • Who may take part, and where would any tickets or entries be handled?
  • What costs, charitable benefit or private benefit are proposed?
  • How would ties, cancellation, unallocated outcomes and complaints be addressed?
  • What information is genuinely necessary, who can access it, and when is it deleted?

Download the TXT question list with your figures and mark unresolved issues. Do not publish invitations or collect money merely because every budget line balances.

Use a notebook, not a participant database

Keep planning separate from participation

Charity fundraising and private workplace arrangements need different contextual checks. A charitable intention does not automatically authorise a lottery, and a charity template is not a universal exemption. Establish the intended beneficiary and obtain suitable advice before making any claim about donations.

Record assumptions and unresolved questions without names. In a hypothetical £40 draft, “£10 intended charitable allocation” describes an assumption, not a donation already made. The worksheet does not transfer funds, track receipts or evidence that a beneficiary received anything.

Privacy planning matters separately from gambling classification. Minimise records, define access and retention, and do not turn an organiser’s contact list into a marketing audience. Our information enquiry is separate from the anonymous tool and is never a prize entry.

Board game tiles, playing pieces and dice on a table
Illustrative tabletop game photograph; no game affiliation or prize offering.

Read by planning task

Reference guides

Official reading and the launch gate

Read the original guidance, not just summaries: Gambling Commission: free draws and prize competitions; work lotteries; CAP promotional marketing rules; and ICO data minimisation.

This is general information, not legal advice. Stop before launching an actual promotion until its mechanism, jurisdiction, advertising, funding and data handling have appropriate qualified review. This website does not offer that approval or run the activity for you.

Practical guides

About · Contact · Privacy · Legal · Cookies